Skip to: site menu | section menu | main content

Ezine-Articles Databank

Quality Ezine Articles Written By Top Writers for Discerning Webmasters!
Currently viewing: Ezine-Articles.Org » Home page
Main Categories

Recently Added Links:

Saltwater Fishing Reels by PRO Challenger - For the best quality Salt Water Fishing Reels/Big Game Fishing Reels/Trolling Reels/Deep Sea Fishing Reels/Sport Fishing Reels at drastically reduced prices than other brand name companies, check out our inventory at PRO Challenger - The Advantage Over The Competition.

Website Ranking - Affordable website ranking and Top 10 ranking Service for under $300.

ZeroCostArticles.com Article Directory - Article directory - free submission of your articles, free content for your website!


Link Directory:

Free Articles (15)
Nutrition Articles (1)
Health Articles (1)
Article Directory (0)
Business Articles (1)
Internet Articles (10)
Weight Loss Articles (3)

Reciprocal Links

  • 5 users online.
Main Menu:

Resources:

Sponsors:

Welcome to Ezine-Articles.Org

Secrets, Lies, and Publishing


by: cosmogirl
Total views: 42
Word Count: 406

The beauty of print-on-demand (from the publisher's perspective) used to be that they had limited liability when it came to content. Sure they'd scan for hate material and other stuff that could definitely get them sued but aside from that, if you had a bone to pick with an ex-boyfriend and wanted to kill him off in a novel, have at it!

Well now that might be changing.

Author House just lost a case in Kansas courtroom citing that the publisher published a book of libelous nature. This from the Publisher's Weekly article which came out yesterday: According to court documents, AuthorHouse published Paperback Poison: the Romance Writer and the Hit Man by Gary D. Brock, with his current wife, Debbie Brock, in November, 2003. Some of the more incendiary claims in Paperback Poison include allegations that Brandewyne broke laws, committed adultery, plagiarized several of her books, and hired a hit man to kill her ex-husband, the book's author.

So when does it become an effective use of a publisher's time to vet every manuscript they get? With the mountain of work that's submitted to any of these publishers on a given day my sense is: it's not. Despite this case I suspect that changes won't be afoot (although a few nervous publishers are no doubt meeting with their attorneys as I write this to have their contracts rewritten).

Most of the time the "hold harmless" clause in POD contracts protects the publisher from such cases, in this situation it did not. Still, let's look at this rationally. With all the thousands of books that have been published since the inception of POD this is the first such libel case that made it into court, that's pretty good in my view. The idea behind POD and the reason it works is the minimal involvement by the publisher, that's the idea it was built on and if you remove that, these publishers will be limited in what they can publish just by the sheer volume or work that's submitted and the extensive vetting process it may have to go through.

The idea is that POD is a do-it-yourself form of publishing and despite the industries rumblings about the quality of work that's published, etc. if this model changes then it's only one step removed from traditional publishing and at the end of the day, that's never what POD's been about.

About the Author

Penny C. Sansevieri is a book publicist who turns authors into success stories. Get her free author marketing newsletter and insider tips at http://www.amarketingexpert.com


Rating: Not yet rated

Comments
No comments posted.
Add Comment
You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.

Get HTML Code